Our Agency works with many small businesses who have health insurance primarily on a fully insured basis with one of four insurers. We've pretty much completed January 1 thru June 1 renewals so I asked for a comparison of last year's renewals to this year. Here are the mid-year results:
2008 +17.31% vs 2009 +16.86%; clients of Insurance Co. A
2008 +20.26% vs 2009 +22.08%; clients of Insurance Co. B
2008 +16.40% vs 2009 +19.88%; clients of Insurance Co. C
2008 +10.61% vs 2009 + 8.45%; clients of Insurance Co. D
All Clients Combined: +16.96% 2008; +19.18% 2009
The above increases are almost always reduced to single digits after plan design changes and/or underwriting with a new insurer. Never the less, what does it say about 'our' insurer's ability to "manage care" if during such troubled economic times and with all the political pressure to contain costs, premium increases like these are still needed to cover more expensive health care and greater utilization!?
Results like these are used by many as proof we need to move to a government run plan as the pace of health care inflation is clearly unsustainable. But such a conclusion misses the more important point. Simply changing payers will either lead to the bankruptcy of the government or rationing of care. Fortunately, as serious reform talk heats up in Washington, the brightest prospects for meaningful "change" address systemic reform of the way we deliver health care.
And might I add that under our current system, at least I have the option of moving to Insurance Company D!
Labels: Pre-Reform Archive Blog